Kyle Hogarth, MD, professor of medicine and medical director of the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program and director of the Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency Clinical Resource Center at University of Chicago Medicine. 

my entire life, I was naturally drawn toward pulmonology as a specialty when I decided to become a doctor.

This fate was sealed during my medical school interviews, when I sat in on one specific lecture. I was enthralled by how the speaker explained the complex physiology of the lungs with such elegant simplicity. Later, when I learned about alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (alpha-1), it felt like the ultimate intersection of my fascination with genetics and my personal connection to pulmonary medicine.

Fast forward to when I was out of medical school, and early in my career as a pulmonologist, a colleague challenged me. His question was simple and straightforward: “What do you know about Alpha-1?”

I gave him the standard, technical answer: “Alpha-1 is a genetic condition that increases a person’s risk of obstructive lung disease and sometimes liver disease. Although it is thought to be a relatively common genetic condition, it is frequently underdiagnosed.”

He recognized that I was giving a textbook response and pushed back, asking, “Have you actually read the guidelines?” I had not.

That brief, albeit somewhat humbling, conversation shifted something in me. I went back, read the guidelines, and began changing how I approached my patients.

That experience proved that a good challenge could change the course of a career. Now, my goal is to pass that challenge onto my peers.

The truth is, there are far too many people living with obstructive lung disease, including COPD, emphysema, and chronic obstructive asthma, who have never been tested for Alpha-1. To my fellow physicians, I urge you to start thinking “inside the box”—specifically, by checking a box in your patients’ EMR to include Alpha-1 testing. This simple action can make a world of difference in uncovering this under-recognized disorder.

There is no secret, special clinical gift to diagnosing Alpha-1. It simply requires following the guidelines to ensure your diagnostic workup includes Alpha-1 testing. I continue to be astounded by the number of times this simple box is skipped over.

Guidelines call for Alpha-1 testing in all patients with COPD, emphysema, and chronic obstructive asthma

Common but frequently underdiagnosed genetic condition

Classic profile (< 45 years old, severe emphysema) misses many cases

Documented across all races and ethnicities, not just northern European descent

Lost lung function cannot be recovered, making early testing critical

As physicians, it can sometimes be easy to fall into clinical complacency. We tell ourselves, “Alpha-1 is too rare to warrant a test.” But the guidelines are clear: every patient diagnosed with COPD, emphysema, and chronic obstructed asthma should be tested for Alpha-1.

Consider the steps we already take to come to a diagnosis of an obstructive lung disease. Adding Alpha-1 testing is not a huge lift; it is simply completing the workup we started. And Alpha-1 testing is widely available, including sponsored testing at no charge. We are already drawing blood to check other labs as part of this workup. Why not check 1 more box and include Alpha-1 testing?

One major roadblock to diagnosing Alpha-1 is the archetype of the patient. The classical 

 described in the literature is young, less than 45 years old, with severe emphysema.

While those patients do exist, Alpha-1 can have varied presentations. If you only test patients who fit that narrow profile, you will miss others with the condition.

We also must dispel the notion that we should only test patients we intend to treat. Some physicians may think, “Why test if they aren’t severe enough to treat with augmentation therapy?”

The answer lies in preventative care and lifestyle modifications. When patients learn they carry a genetic risk factor for lung disease, they often make decisions to proactively protect their lungs, such as avoiding environmental pollution or quitting smoking.

Additionally, we must also disregard the old-school myth that Alpha-1 affects mainly people with northern European descent.

 While historically described in those populations, Alpha-1 has been documented across every race and ethnicity. If your patient has obstructive lung disease, they need to be tested, regardless of race or background.

We must find these patients early because of a simple reality: loss of lung function is irreversible.

We all lose lung function as we get older—it’s a natural part of the aging process.

But in Alpha-1 patients, the loss is potentially accelerated.

Let’s look closer at the cellular level. The primary role of the protein alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) is to inhibit neutrophil elastase, an enzyme that degrades elastin in the lung’s alveolar walls.

When a patient has Alpha-1, this enzyme goes unchecked. Think of it as a town overrun by fires with not enough firefighters to put out the flames.

When I diagnose patients who have dramatically declined lung function, I can support them, but I cannot give them back what they lost. We need to shift the timeline. We must find these patients 

while they still have most of their lung function intact

so we can step in and prevent more flames from forming for as long as possible.

Our therapeutic goal for Alpha-1 patients with obstructive lung disease is to help protect the lungs.

For decades, weekly augmentation therapy, intended to raise AAT levels in the lungs and bloodstream, has been the standard of care for these patients.

Historically, we have aimed for a putative target of maintaining serum AAT levels above a threshold of 11 µM, a benchmark long thought to be the minimal serum protein level before the risk of lung disease sets in.

 However, this threshold has been increasingly questioned and is potentially due for a reevaluation.

 Other research has shown that risk of potential lung damage may increase when patients’ AAT serum levels fall below the range of approximately 20–53 µM, with the degree of that risk dependent on other factors like genotype or exposure.

I began with a story of being challenged earlier in my career, so it is only fitting to close with a challenge of my own.

I recently gave a talk on Alpha-1, and a fellow physician pushed back on the lack of data regarding therapy in the space, explaining he doesn’t often test patients for Alpha-1 because of this lack of data. My response was straightforward: “We’re never going to get the data you’re looking for if doctors aren’t testing.”

I worried I had been too blunt, but it turns out the message hit its mark. He has started routinely testing his patients for Alpha-1. For me, that is a mission accomplished.

If we want better data, better trials, and better treatments, we have to start by checking the box. Test your patients for Alpha-1.

Hogarth was compensated by Sanofi for his time on this article.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. MedlinePlus. 

https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/alpha-1-antitrypsin-deficiency/

Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency: Answers to 5 Frequently Asked Questions. American Lung Association. Published August 14, 2023. Accessed September 3, 2026. 

https://www.lung.org/blog/alpha-1-deficiency-faqs

American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Standards for the Diagnosis and Management of Individuals with Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency, 

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

, Volume 168, Issue 7, October 2003, Pages 818–900, 

Sandhaus RA, Turino G, Brantly ML, et al. The diagnosis and management of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency in the adult. 

http://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.3.3.2015.0182

2026 GOLD Report and Pocket Guide. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Accessed September 3, 2026. 

https://goldcopd.org/2026-gold-report-and-pocket-guide/

Barjaktarevic I, Campos M. Management of lung disease in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: what we do and what we do not know. 

. 2021;12_suppl:20406223211010172. Published 2021 Jul 29. 

Frederick J de Serres; Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency is not a rare disease but a disease that is rarely diagnosed.. 

 1 December 2003; 111 (16): 1851–1854. 

Lung Capacity and Aging. American Lung Association. Accessed September 3, 2026. 

https://www.lung.org/lung-health-diseases/how-lungs-work/lung-capacity-and-aging

Stockley RA, Edgar RG, Pillai A, Turner AM. Individualized lung function trends in alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency: a need for patience in order to provide patient centered management?. 

. 2016;11:1745-1756. Published 2016 Aug 1. 

Xiang S, Yang L, He Y, et al. Alpha-1 Antitrypsin as a Regulatory Protease Inhibitor Modulating Inflammation and Shaping the Tumor Microenvironment in Cancer. 

Treating and Managing Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency. American Lung Association. Accessed September 3, 2026. 

https://www.lung.org/lung-health-diseases/lung-disease-lookup/alpha-1-antitrypsin-deficiency/treating-and-managing

Wells AD, Woods A, Hilleman DE, Malesker MA. Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Replacement in Patients With COPD. 

Franciosi AN, Fraughen D, Carroll TP, McElvaney NG. Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: clarifying the role of the putative protective threshold. 

. 2022;59(2):2101410. Published 2022 Feb 10. 

Mulkareddy V, Roman J. Pulmonary manifestations of alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency. 

Articles

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency remains underrecognized in obstructive lung disease despite clear guideline recommendations for universal testing in COPD, emphysema, and chronic obstructive asthma. Routine EMR-enabled testing can overcome clinical inertia, broaden detection beyond the “young severe emphysema” stereotype, and address misconceptions about treatment candidacy and ancestry. Early identification matters because alveolar destruction from unopposed neutrophil elastase is irreversible and may be accelerated. Augmentation therapy remains foundational, while the traditional 11 µM protective threshold is increasingly debated.

Kyle Hogarth, MD, urges physicians to complete Alpha-1 testing during every COPD or asthma workup, warning that skipped tests delay diagnosis.

News

news page, resources on the topics of disease- and specialty-specific medical news and expert insight can be found. Content includes articles, interviews, videos, podcasts, and breaking news on health care research, treatment, and drug development.

Clinical

clinical page is a resource for content on every specialty, disease, and topic available on our medical news site.

Pulmonology

Infectious Disease condition center page is a comprehensive resource for clinical news and insights on respiratory health. This page consists of interviews, articles, podcasts, and videos on the research, treatment and development of therapies for asthma, COPD, interstitial lung disease, COVID-19, and more.

Asthma

The HCPLive asthma page is a comprehensive resource for clinical news and insights on asthmatic disease. This page consists of interviews, articles, podcasts, and videos on the research, treatment and development of therapies for allergic and severe asthma, and more.

Why Doctors Need to Complete the COPD or Asthma Workup to Rule Out Alpha-1

Pacibekitug outperformed placebo in reducing hs-CRP, Lp(a), and other inflammatory biomarkers in patients with 

 during the TRANQUILITY trial; however, without being powered for 

, the question of this drug’s efficacy in risk reduction still remains.

Next Steps for Pacibekitug Following Positive TRANQUILITY Results

The data from TRANQUILITY were presented at the 

European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress 2026

 in Munich, Germany, by Deepak Bhatt, MD, MPH, MBA, director of Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital and the Dr. Valentin Fuster Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. In an exclusive interview, 

 breaks down the results and investigators’ plans for a phase 3 trial of pacibekitug for cardiovascular events.

“This trial was meant to be a proof of principle, that the drug does what it’s supposed to – safely lowering hs-CRP in the context of a modest-size phase 2 trial,” Bhatt told 

. “For the phase 3 trial planning, we were really never considering CKD because that’s a tough population. Things that have worked in other non-CKD populations for cardiovascular risk reduction haven’t always worked in advanced kidney disease.”

TRANQUILITY, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating pacibekitug administered quarterly and monthly to patients with CKD and elevated hs-CRP, enrolled patients with a serum hs-CRP level ≥2.0 mg/L and <15 mg/L and a diagnosis of CKD, among other criteria. These patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to either pacibekitug 25 mg or 50 mg every 90 days, 15 mg every 30 days, or placebo.

The primary endpoint was time-averaged percent change from baseline in hs-CRP by day 90. Secondary endpoints included time-averaged percent change in hs-CRP through day 180, the proportion of patients with time-averaged hs-CRP <2 mg/L at 90 days, and the safety and tolerability of pacibekitug.

A total of 143 patients were enrolled, of whom 72% were receiving statins and 59% had diabetes. Bhatt and colleagues noted dose-dependent reductions in hs-CRP by day 30, which were sustained through 180 days. The median time-averaged change was -76% with pacibekitug 25 mg, -85% with 50 mg, and -89% with 15 mg, compared to +7% with placebo. Fibrinogen and Lp(a) also saw sustained reductions in the pacibekitug arms, and no dose-related safety signals were recorded.

However, the trial itself was not powered to detect cardiovascular outcome improvements. Given the additional reductions in Lp(a), coupled with inflammation’s direct influence on cardiovascular disease risk, Bhatt believes that further data from ongoing trials will determine whether these targets are associated with cardiovascular benefit. On the other hand, inflammation is a notoriously narrow window to target – past trials, including CANTOS and ZEUS, have indicated the risk of increased fatal infection if inflammation is too significantly reduced and the lack of cardiovascular benefit if the effect is too small.

“The inflammation story is ongoing,” Bhatt said. “There are a number of trials in different therapeutic areas, and lots of different companies planning trials with various anti-inflammatory agents, phase 2 trials, phase 3 trials, ongoing in the planning stages. We’ll see whether that is also an independent axis of risk reduction. But for now, Lp(a) reduction, hs-CRP reduction, and a broader reduction of arterial inflammation all seem like promising approaches to study.”

Editor’s Note: Bhatt reports disclosures with GSK, Merck, Cereno Scientific, Angiowave, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, and others.

Bhatt D. TRANQUILITY: Efficacy of monthly and quarterly dosing of pacibekitug (IL-6 ligand mAb) targeting inflammation in CKD with high cardiovascular risk. Presented at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress 2026, Munich, Germany. August 28-31, 2026.

Tourmaline Bio. A Study to Evaluate TOUR006 in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Elevated Hs-CRP (TRANQUILITY). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06362759. Updated August 11, 2026. Accessed September 4, 2026. 

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06362759

Videos

Deepak Bhatt, MD, MPH, MBA, discusses the next steps for pacibekitug in cardiovascular disease following its success in the phase 2 trial.

Cardiology

Cardiology condition center page is a comprehensive resource for clinical news and insights on cardiovascular and cardiometabolic diseases. This page consists of interviews, articles, podcasts, and videos on the research, treatment and development of therapies for heart disease and cardiovascular events, as well as associated diabetes, renal failure, and more...

Chronic Kidney Disease

Conference

 conference coverage page features articles, videos, and expert-led live coverage from major medical meetings throughout the year.

Patrick Campbell is the editorial director of HCPLive. Patrick has spent years spearheading coverage surrounding cardiometabolic health and rheumatic disease for MJH Life Sciences. Before joining MJH Life Sciences in 2019, he spent time as a beat reporter and/or multimedia specialist with the Pocono Record, Star News Group, and NJ Advance Media. He is the executive producer for multiple HCPLive podcasts, including Diabetes Dialogue, Don't Miss a Beat, Kidney Compass, Medical Ethics Unpacked, The Medical Sisterhood, and Skin of Color Savvy. 


Follow him on Twitter @RealPatCampbell or reach him via email at PCampbell@mjhlifesciences.com.

The phase 3 Lp(a)HORIZON trial evaluating pelacarsen did not meet its primary endpoint of reducing major adverse 

 events in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and established cardiovascular disease (CVD), Novartis announced on September 4, 2026.

Pelacarsen, a GalNAc-conjugated antisense oligonucleotide designed to suppress hepatic Lp(a) production at its source, was evaluated in a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2020, which enrolled 286 patients with established cardiovascular disease and screening Lp(a) levels of at least 60 mg/dL. The phase 2 trial demonstrated dose-dependent Lp(a) reductions of up to 80% with the 20-mg weekly dose, with injection-site reactions as the most common adverse event, supporting advancement into the phase 3 outcomes trial.

Did pelacarsen meet its primary endpoint in Lp(a)HORIZON?


No. Despite achieving lower Lp(a) levels than placebo, pelacarsen did not significantly reduce the composite cardiovascular endpoint in the overall study population.

What is pelacarsen's mechanism of action?


Pelacarsen is a GalNAc-conjugated antisense oligonucleotide that suppresses hepatic Lp(a) production, previously demonstrating up to 80% Lp(a) reduction in phase 2 dose-finding studies.

“Lp(a)HORIZON was a pioneering cardiovascular outcomes trial designed to answer one of the most important unanswered questions in cardiovascular medicine by evaluating whether lowering Lp(a) can reduce residual cardiovascular risk beyond optimized, guideline-directed care, when other major cardiovascular risk factors are already being managed,” said Shreeram Aradhye, MD, president of development and chief medical officer, Novartis.

Lp(a)HORIZON trial design and topline results

Lp(a)HORIZON (NCT04023552) is a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter global cardiovascular outcomes trial enrolling 8323 patients with elevated Lp(a) and established CVD

. The primary endpoint is a composite 4-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) outcome, including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and urgent coronary revascularization requiring hospitalization, evaluated in the overall population (Lp[a] ≥70 mg/dL) and a subpopulation (Lp[a] ≥90 mg/dL). Participants received guideline-directed treatments including lipid-lowering and antihypertensive therapies throughout the trial.

According to the company, pelacarsen achieved lower Lp(a) levels compared with placebo, but this reduction did not translate into a significant decrease in the composite cardiovascular endpoint in the overall study population. Full trial data have not yet been released and are planned for presentation at an upcoming medical congress.

Implications for the Lp(a)-lowering treatment landscape

“Although lower Lp(a) levels were observed with pelacarsen, the findings did not demonstrate this translated into reduced cardiovascular risk in the overall study population,” said Aradhye.

 “These are not the results we hoped for, but they provide important evidence that advances scientific understanding of the relationship between Lp(a) lowering and cardiovascular outcomes and may help inform future approaches to cardiovascular risk management.”

The topline miss arrives as several other Lp(a)-lowering nucleic acid therapies remain in ongoing phase 3 trials. 

Investigators presenting phase 2 ALPACA data on lepodisiran, an extended-duration small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting Lp(a), at ESC Congress 2026 reported reductions in Lp(a)-bound oxidized phospholipids of up to 94% at the highest studied dose, though they emphasized this biomarker effect does not itself establish clinical benefit.

 Zerlasiran, another siRNA in phase 2 development, has similarly demonstrated substantial Lp(a) reductions sustained through 48 weeks.

Novartis did not indicate whether the Lp(a)HORIZON result will affect the regulatory pathway for pelacarsen or the design of ongoing phase 3 substudies, including trials in Black, African American, and Hispanic populations and in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome.

Novartis. Novartis announces Lp(a)HORIZON Phase III topline results for pelacarsen in patients with elevated Lp(a) and established cardiovascular disease (CVD). Published September 4, 2026. Accessed September 5, 2026. 

Tsimikas S, Karwatowska-Prokopczuk E, Gouni-Berthold I, et al. Lipoprotein(a) reduction in persons with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:244-255. doi:

Nissen SE, Navar AM, Krege JH, et al. Effect on lipoprotein(a) oxidized phospholipids of lepodisiran, an extended-duration siRNA targeting lipoprotein(a). JACC. Published online 2026. doi:

Campbell P. Zerlasiran provides significant Lp(a) reductions at 48 weeks, phase 2 data shows. 

. Published June 20, 2024. Accessed September 5, 2026.

Novartis reported that the phase 3 Lp(a)HORIZON outcomes trial of pelacarsen failed to significantly reduce 4-point MACE in patients with established CVD and elevated Lp(a), despite achieving lower Lp(a) versus placebo on top of guideline-directed therapy. Earlier phase 2 data had shown dose-dependent Lp(a) lowering up to 80% with weekly 20 mg, with injection-site reactions most common. Full phase 3 results are pending congress presentation, informing the broader uncertainty around Lp(a) lowering translating into clinical benefit.

Novartis announced pelacarsen did not meet its primary endpoint in the phase 3 Lp(a)HORIZON cardiovascular outcomes trial despite Lp(a) lowering.

Dyslipidemia

Pelacarsen Misses Primary Endpoint in Lp(a)HORIZON Phase 3 Trial

Victoria Johnson joined MJH Life Sciences in 2020 and has written for NeurologyLive, CGTLive, and is now an assistant managing editor for HCPLive and RheumatologyLive. She doesn’t have enough time for her numerous hobbies. You can reach her at vjohnson@mjhlifesciences.com.

 showed a higher burden of respiratory microplastics than patients without cancer in a paired analysis of airway and lung tissue samples, according to data presented at the 

European Respiratory Society (ERS) Congress 2026

 in Barcelona, Spain, held September 5 to 9.

Inhalation is an increasingly recognized route of human exposure to airborne microplastics, but data from paired airway and tissue respiratory compartments have remained scarce, according to the study investigators.

 Researchers led by Ilias Dimeas, MD, of University College Dublin School of Medicine and the University of Thessaly, prospectively collected paired bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and lung tissue samples from adults undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy. The analysis aimed to quantify microplastic burden and its relationship to clinical diagnosis.

“Microplastics have become an unavoidable part of our environment, but we still know remarkably little about what happens once they enter the human body,” said Dimeas, who presented the findings.

 “If we are breathing these particles in every day, we need to understand where they end up and whether they could be linked to disease.”

Microplastic burden and compartmental distribution

Investigators enrolled 100 adults undergoing bronchoscopy for lung symptoms at University Hospital of Larissa, Thessaly, Greece, including 50 subsequently diagnosed with lung cancer and 50 who were not. Each patient provided a BAL sample, and roughly half also provided a lung tissue biopsy. Microplastics were isolated from all samples under strict contamination control and characterized by stereo-microscopy, with 40% of particles undergoing micro-Raman spectroscopy for polymer identification.

Do patients with lung cancer have more microplastics in their lungs?

Yes. In a study of 100 patients undergoing bronchoscopy, those with lung cancer had a higher overall microplastic burden and were more likely to have detectable microplastics in airway samples than patients without cancer.

Where do microplastics accumulate in the lung?

Microplastic counts in airway (BAL) samples and lung tissue samples did not correlate and were inversely related in patients with malignancy, suggesting microplastics are not distributed evenly and different lung regions may retain particles differently.

What types of plastic were found in the lungs?

Polypropylene and polyethylene, both common in packaging, textiles, and consumer products, were the most frequently identified plastic types.

Across the full cohort, investigators identified 232 microplastic particles, and 70% of patients had detectable microplastics in at least 1 sample.

 Patients with lung cancer were more likely to have detectable microplastics in BAL than patients without cancer (66% versus 46%) and had a higher overall microplastic burden.

 In a paired-sample analysis, investigators identified 186 microplastics across 100 paired BAL and tissue samples, predominantly fragments (88.2%), with total burden significantly higher in patients with malignancy (P = .025).

Plastic composition and compartmental discordance

Total microplastic counts correlated strongly with BAL counts (ρ = 0.66; 

 <.001) but not with tissue counts (ρ = -0.18; 

 = .203), indicating compartmental discordance between airway and tissue compartments.

 Within the malignancy subgroup, BAL and tissue microplastic counts showed a significant inverse correlation (ρ ≈ -0.60; 

 = .001), suggesting particles retained in the airway and particles embedded in tissue may not track together in the same patient.

 Raman-characterized particles showed a non-random distribution by diagnosis, with fluorescence-only particles enriched in epithelial malignancies (χ² 

Because BAL samples capture particles from the airspaces while tissue samples capture particles embedded within the lung, investigators said the inverse relationship suggests microplastics may not be distributed evenly throughout the lung, with different regions retaining particles differently.

 Polypropylene and polyethylene, both widely used in packaging, textiles, and consumer goods, were the most common plastic types identified across samples.

“We need more research to fully understand their potential role in lung diseases, including cancer,” said Barbara Hoffmann, MD, chair of the ERS Advocacy Council at the University of Dusseldorf, who was not involved in the research.

Dimeas and colleagues are continuing laboratory work to characterize the plastic types identified and how they may interact with lung cells.

 They are separately analyzing samples from patients with chronic lung disease to assess whether microplastics contribute to lung scarring and disease progression.

 The findings will be presented in the occupational and environmental health session at the congress.

Dimeas IE, Zakynthinos GE, Salmas C, et al. High respiratory microplastic burden across paired airway and tissue samples in patients with lung cancer. Abstract 1291. Presented at: European Respiratory Society (ERS) Congress 2026; September 5-9, 2026; Barcelona, Spain.

European Respiratory Society. Patients diagnosed with lung cancer found to have more microplastic in their lungs. Published September 4, 2026. Accessed September 5, 2026. 

https://www.ersnet.org/news-and-features/news/patients-diagnosed-with-lung-cancer-found-to-have-more-micorplastic/

Paired BAL and lung tissue sampling from 100 adults undergoing bronchoscopy showed widespread respiratory microplastics, detected in 70% of participants. Those ultimately diagnosed with lung cancer had higher BAL detectability (66% vs 46%) and greater total microplastic burden in paired analyses (P=.025). Most particles were fragments, with polypropylene and polyethylene predominant. Airway and tissue burdens were discordant, including an inverse BAL–tissue correlation within malignancy, suggesting heterogeneous regional retention. Fluorescence-only Raman signals were enriched in epithelial malignancies. Findings motivate mechanistic studies on cellular interactions and fibrotic sequelae.

Paired airway and tissue sampling from 100 patients found greater microplastic burden in those with lung cancer.

Lung Cancer

Lung Cancer Diagnosis Linked to Lung Microplastic Presence, Quantity

Ross M. Levy, MD, serves as a dermatologist at Endeavor Health in Illinois, specializing in cosmetic and surgical dermatology with expertise in Mohs surgery for skin cancer.

At LEADderm 2026, a panel titled ‘Skin Angels at LEADderm: Building the Next Generation of Dermatology Innovation’ addressed the topic of entrepreneurship in 

 The session walked attendees through how an idea becomes a company and outlined ways clinicians can support innovation alongside routine clinical work. Panelists framed innovation broadly, covering new treatments and devices as well as technologies reshaping the clinician and patient experience.

The panel also highlighted how many clinicians already contribute to innovation without recognizing it, whether through daily practice feedback or side projects, and outlined pathways for deeper involvement in supporting these companies. For early-career dermatologists, panelists emphasized starting from an everyday clinical pain point rather than waiting for a polished business plan. Ross Levy, MD, a dermatologist at Endeavor Health specializing in cosmetic and surgical dermatology with Mohs surgery expertise, joined fellow panelists Manju Dawkins, MD, Buu Duong, MD, Peter Lio, MD, and Ross Lane Pearlman, MD.

In the following interview, Levy spoke with 

 at LEADderm 2026 in Newport Beach, California, about why the panel mattered and what innovation looks like day to day in dermatology for clinicians:

: Why did you feel this Skin Angels panel was an important talk to give at LEADderm?

It's a great question. No matter what you do in dermatology or in healthcare, innovation and new companies moving our field forward is important for everybody to be aware of, and to understand how it happens. Sometimes the process of how an idea starts and becomes a company can be a little opaque. Part of the session was introducing people to how that process works, how often clinicians are already involved in that innovation, and how people can get involved, both through their regular work and on the side if they want to support these companies. That was the genesis of the session.

: What does dermatology innovation look like day to day, and how does that connect to the Skin Angels community?

Generally speaking, innovation is just thinking outside the box and doing something new. That's especially true for people in their mid to later careers, like myself, who have our own certain ways of doing things. When we talk about innovation as a broad term, it's everything: innovation on a personal level, and innovation with respect to new treatments and devices coming out. Specifically along the lines of Skin Angels, that innovation is generally on the industry side, meaning what new devices and treatments are coming and how we can improve the specialty for our patients, not just in terms of treatments and devices, but also technologies that improve the clinician and patient experience. From the standpoint of our group, it's really about innovating in how we interact with patients and with the rest of the world.

: As part of Skin Angels, what gap were you trying to fill that existing dermatology mentorship or education pathways don't cover?

It's about getting involved and thinking more broadly beyond your own practice. We spend the whole day treating patients and doing clinical medicine, and the point of the session and the group as a whole is to stand back from that and ask what else is going on in dermatology we can be involved in.

Editor's Note: This transcript has been edited for grammar and clarity using artificial intelligence tools. Levy did not have any relevant disclosures of note.

LEADderm. About LEADderm: the missing curriculum. 

Dawkins M, Lio P, et al. Skin Angels at LEADderm: Building the Next Generation of Dermatology Innovation. Session presented at LEADderm. Aug 29-30, 2026.

Dermatology entrepreneurship was positioned as a practical, clinician-accessible continuum from bedside observations to scalable companies. Emphasis centered on demystifying how ideas evolve into ventures, and on recognizing that routine clinical feedback and side projects already constitute meaningful innovation. Innovation was defined broadly to include therapeutics, devices, and workflow technologies that improve clinician and patient experiences. Early-career physicians were encouraged to start with concrete, recurring clinical pain points rather than waiting for a fully formed business plan.

Ross Levy, MD, explains why the LEADderm Skin Angels panel matters and what dermatology innovation looks like in daily practice.

Dermatology

The HCPLive dermatology page is a resource for medical news and expert insights on skin disease. This page features expert-led coverage, articles, videos and research on the therapies and development of treatments for dermatologic conditions, and more.

Dermatology's Path From Idea to Innovation, With Ross Levy, MD

August 2026 pulmonology highlights include deupirfenidone's positive phase 2b ELEVATE-IPF results, FDA Fast Track for LTI-03, and more.

Pulmonary Fibrosis

7 Pulmonology Headlines You Missed in August 2026

Nurse practitioners discuss escalating biologic therapy for asthma and COPD, mucus plugging data, and access barriers.

COPD

COPD condition center page, resources on the topics of medical news and expert insight into chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can be found. Content includes articles, interviews, videos, podcasts, and breaking news on COPD research, treatment, and drug development.

Latest News

Why Doctors Need to Complete the COPD or Asthma Workup to Rule Out Alpha-1

Next Steps for Pacibekitug Following Positive TRANQUILITY Results

Pelacarsen Misses Primary Endpoint in Lp(a)HORIZON Phase 3 Trial

Lung Cancer Diagnosis Linked to Lung Microplastic Presence, Quantity

Dermatology's Path From Idea to Innovation, With Ross Levy, MD