Consultant.

Blog
Primary Care Matters

End of Life: A Primary Care "Road Less Traveled"

By Gregory W. Rutecki, MD
University of South Alabama | August 20, 2010

In many instances, our patients receive invasive and aggressive subspecialty care at or near the end of life. Such care can become burdensome and painful without a favorable outcome. As advocates for our patients, we must ensure that their pain, shortness of breath, and other bothersome symptoms are alleviated, thus leading to a “good death.” We also need to be sensitive to these patients’ preferences for end of life care.

A recent study can teach us both about quality indicators in this specific cohort and about how we can do better for this growing and vulnerable group.¹ Some of the measures studied were a result of planning by primary care providers long before patients reached the ICU.

ASSESSMENT OF END OF LIFE CARE
Sixteen quality indicators for end of life care were assessed in an appropriate target population; more than 50% of the group experienced end-stage disease and 28% were aged 75 years and older. Some of the indicators received very low scores for compliance. For example, if a “vulnerable elder” was admitted to the ICU and survived 48 hours, that person’s preferences for further care should be considered or an attempt should be made to identify them. Unfortunately, this important indicator was performed only 46% of the time.

Another indicator, specifically for persons who were not expected to survive and who had had ventilator support withdrawn, stated that the patient should be assessed for dyspnea and, if present, symptomatically treated with sedation. Assessment for dyspnea after ventilator withdrawal occurred in only 29% of those studied. Furthermore, for patients who had an implantable defibrillator and who were terminally ill or enrolled in hospice, it should be documented in the medical record that the defibrillator had been inactivated or the reasons why this had not been done should be explained. This activity was performed 25% of the time in the study population.

Certain important indicators had high response rates. Appropriate documentation before placement of feeding tubes took place 100% of the time. Advance directives for “do not resuscitate” status were known and followed in 96% of the occurrences in the study.

PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE
This study had some weaknesses. Although it was of sufficient size (N = 496), it was performed at one center and was retrospective. However, it is a good “snapshot” of where we do well and not so well in end of life care in those patients who frequent the ICU.

Since many of our patients spend time in critical care units near the end of their lives, we as their primary caretakers—oftentimes also with the longest relationship—should be comfortable with the quality indicators used in this study. It would be worthwhile for each of us to determine how we score in their implementation. Our patients will come to expect oversight of end of life quality from us.

by philip bonanni | February 01, 2011 11:15 AM EST

With the decline in the primary care physician's role (aka using hospitlaists, nurse practioners, physician assistants et al) this very essential requisite in caring for patients has become a roulette wheel....of who, when, and how. Which doctor should do it? When (at what age)should it be done? States and hospitals have requirements for the "form to be completed." Insurers and the governmant are going to "cover"the discussion. As described above, a doctor-patient relationship (one of some duration) is a critical ingredient to having the patient and the family on board with what treatments are "caring and wanted" in everyone's unavoidable end-of-life scenario. Yes...we must acknowledge culural and ethical diversity per individual,... yes we must do no harm,... but how it is done and when it is done should not be a "regulated" responsibility....It must be intrinsic to good doctoring. Philip P. Bonanni, MD

REFERENCE:
1. Walling AM, Asch SM, Lorenz KA, et al. The quality of care provided to hospitalized patients at the end of life. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1057-1063.

BLOG FOR CONSULTANTLIVE

Send us your blogs! Contact us for more information if you are interested in writing a post or becoming a blogger.

TOPIC INDEX

Developmental/Genetic

Nutritional/Metabolic

ABOUT OUR BLOGGERS

	Beat Physician Burnout Dike Drummond MD is an expert in stress management and burnout prevention for physicians. He is a high energy speaker, trainer, and consultant on how to create physician engagement, healthy life balance and a physician friendly workplace. He is CEO of TheHappyMD.com where his newsletter reaches doctors in 63 countries around the world. Dr. Drummond is the creator of the Burnout Prevention Video Training Series and the 1 Minute Mindfulness Program for Physicians.
	On Health and Mental Health Erik R. Vanderlip, MD, is a senior fellow and acting instructor in the University of Washington Department of Psychiatry. As a dually-trained family physician and psychiatrist, Dr Vanderlip is active in national health system redesign efforts with a particular interest in newer models of the medical home. He practices family medicine in a hybrid primary care clinic within a mental health center in Seattle.
	The HIV-AIDS Observer Rodger D. MacArthur, MD, is Professor of Medicine, Wayne State University, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Director and Site Principal Investigator, Wayne State University HIV/AIDS Clinical Research Unit.
	Speaking of Pain Steven A. King, MD, MS, is in the private practice of pain medicine in New York, and he is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at the New York University School of Medicine, New York.
	Tales Doctors Tell David T Nash, MD, is Clinical Professor of Medicine at Upstate Medical Center in Syracuse, New York. The author of more than 250 peer-reviewed clinical articles, Dr Nash has practiced cardiology in Syracuse for over 50 years. He is a Fellow of the National Lipid Association.
	Primary Care Matters Gregory W. Rutecki, MD, is Professor of Medicine at the University of South Alabama College of Medicine in Mobile. He is section editor of the hypertension topic center on this web site.
	Practice Makes Perfect Pamela Wible, MD, pioneered the first community-designed ideal medical clinic in America. An expert in patient-centered care, Dr Wible helps citizens design cutting-edge clinics and hospitals nationwide. Her model is taught in medical schools and featured in Harvard School of Public Health's newest edition of Renegotiating Health Care. Dr. Wible is a medical reporter for the Oregonian, has been interviewed by CNN, ABC, CBS, and is a frequent guest on NPR.

FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE

Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.

Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden, June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.

Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler, June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.

Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate, June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.

iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.

End of Life: A Primary Care "Road Less Traveled"

Join the Conversation