ConsultantLive Members: Login | Register
ConsultantLive SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
About Us
Blogs
Dermclinic
Photoclinic
Pediatric Center
Multimedia
Topics
What's Your Diagnosis?
 

Home » Diabetes Type 2

ConsultantLive.com.
 

Diabetes Drug-eluting Stents: Second Generation Safer Than First

By Elvin Kedhi, MD, PhD | January 30, 2013
Dr Kedhi is in the Department of Cardiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

For patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), the second-generation everolimus-eluting stent (EES) appears to be safer than 2 first-generation stents, the sirolimus(Drug information on sirolimus)-eluting stent (SES) and the paclitaxel(Drug information on paclitaxel)-eluting stent (PES). This safety profile correlates with lower observed risk of stent thrombosis, according to an analysis of insights from a nationwide coronary intervention registry.

The EES has shown outstanding safety properties when compared with the first-generation drug-eluting stents. Therefore, my colleagues and I thought it important to study whether the safety advantage of the EES as previously shown in other studies could be observed in a large all-comer registry.

We used the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) to compare the safety of the EES with that of the SES and PES using a primary composite end point of clinically driven detected restenosis, definite stent thrombosis, and all-cause mortality. Our study results were published recently in the journal JACC Cardiovascular Interventions.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Some 4751 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)–treated patients with DM were included in the SCAAR from January 18, 2007 to July 29, 2011; 8134 stents were implanted (EES, 3928; PES, 2836; and SES, 1370). The EES was associated with a significantly lower risk of the composite primary end point compared with the SES (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99; 95% CI: 1.19-3.08) and a strong trend toward lower risk compared with the PES (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.93-1.91).

These results were driven mainly by a lower incidence of stent thrombosis and mortality. No significant differences in restenosis rates were observed between the EES and the SES or PES.

The results are clear: EES is associated with significant lower mortality, and this correlates with lower observed risk of stent thrombosis compared with the SES or PES. This is the first study to show such results, even in high-risk patients such as those with DM.

On the other hand, there was no difference between the EES device and the first-generation drug-eluting stent devices in terms of efficacy. Earlier reports showed that the worse outcomes after PCI with drug-eluting stents in patients who have DM than in those who do not are driven mainly by higher rates of death, cardiac death, and myocardial infarction (ie, safety end points), but the efficacy end points do not differ significantly between these 2 groups in the drug-eluting stent era.1,2 Therefore, the EES—by improving safety, including mortality—takes a step forward in the PCI treatment of patients with DM.

A Message of Hope
The message for primary care physicians is one of hope. Until now, new devices have not shown any progress in treatment of patients with DM. In addition, reports from large randomized studies have shown that atherosclerotic disease in patients with DM is better managed surgically (eg, with a coronary artery bypass graft3) mainly because of better results in terms of safety, including mortality. However, the devices used in these trials were first-generation drug-eluting stents. As shown in this study, the new generation thin-strut, durable, polymer drug-eluting stents, such as the EES, can improve safety outcomes in patients with DM.

Larger, dedicated trials are still needed to elucidate the role of newer generation drug-eluting stents to further shape treatment indications and strategies for patients with DM.

References
1. Billinger M, Räber L, Hitz S, et al. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of diabetic patients after revascularization with early generation drug-eluting stents. Am Heart J. 2012;163:876-886.
2. Iijima R, Ndrepepa G, Mehilli J, et al. Impact of diabetes mellitus on long-term outcomes in the drug-eluting stent era. Am Heart J. 2007;154:688-693.
3. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2375-2384.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

Update on Diabetes

Residual Cardiovascular Risks: Don’t Forget Kidney and Vascular Disease

GLP-1 Agonists Linked to Higher Pancreatitis Risk

DPP-4 Antagonists: Benefits, Risks, and the Future

NIH: More Diabetes Patients Meeting Metabolic Goals

FDA Triple Play Against Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes in Older Patients: Worse Long-term Outcomes After Coronary Interventions

Diabetes Drug-eluting Stents: Second Generation Safer Than First

Exercise vs Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, Hypertension, and Diabetes

Diabetes-related Retinopathy, Foot Ulcers, and Other Lesions: A Photo Essay

Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease in an Elderly Woman: How Would You Treat?

Managing Diabetes in Older Patients: Consensus Report

Diabetes Mortality Risk Lower in Physically Active Patients






 
TOPIC INDEX

Asthma

Atrial Fibrillation

Cardiovascular

Cerebrovascular

Developmental/Genetic

Diabetes

Diabetes Type 2

Fibromyalgia

Geriatrics

GI Disorders

Gout

Health Care Reform

HIV/AIDS

Hypertension

Infection

Mental Health

 

Musculoskeletal

Nervous System

Nutritional/Metabolic 

Otorhinolaryngologic 

Pain

Pediatrics

Physical Abuse

Respiratory Tract 

Rheumatic Diseases

Seasonal Allergies

Skin Diseases

Sleep Disorders

Urologic Diseases

Vaccines

Women’s Health

All Topics

 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Painful Red Ear
  • Facial Skin Problems—A Photo Essay
  • Go For The Glory Quiz: Persistent Oral Lesions, Nevus or Melanoma?, Altered Mental Status in Middle Age, An Itchy, Scaly Rash, Painful Blisters of the Hand
  • Scaly Plaque on the Nose
  • T-Wave Inversions: Sorting Through the Causes
  • Tuberculosis Diagnosis With Handheld Device
  • Physician, First Do No Harm—To Yourself
  • Making the Most of Antihypertensive Drug Combinations
  • Why Doctors Commit Suicide
  • Superficial Abrasion After a Fall From a Bicycle
  • Crohn’s Disease: New Scoring System Predicts Mild Disease
  • Iron-deficiency Anemia in IBD: These Patients Need Primary Care
  • Statins Plus Exercise: New Study Questions the Combination
  • Benign Congenital Nevus
  • IBS Diagnosis: Clinical Gestalt vs Clear-cut Criteria
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma
  • Short on Physicians, Long on Adverse Effects
  • Wanted: Physician Feedback on Medical Cannabis
  • Why Doctors Commit Suicide
  • Crusted Scabies
  • Short on Physicians, Long on Adverse Effects
  • Furuncle Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infection
  • Resistant Hypertension: Four Pearls for Your Practice
  • Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma
  • Wanted: Physician Feedback on Medical Cannabis
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Diabetes Type 2
Evidence on Diabetes Type 2
Guidelines on Diabetes Type 2
Patient Education on Diabetes Type 2
Clinical Trials on Diabetes Type 2
Practical Articles on Diabetes Type 2
Research and Reviews on Diabetes Type 2
All "Diabetes Type 2" results


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy