ConsultantLive Members: Login | Register
 |  |
ConsultantLive SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
About Us
Blogs
Dermclinic
Photoclinic
Pediatric Center
Multimedia
What's Your Diagnosis?
Jobs
Buyer's Guide
 

Home » Hypertension

Consultant. Vol. 47 No. 6
Hypertension Q&A
Matters of the Heart—and Other Organs 

Blood Pressure: What's Optimal? What's Not?

By DONALD G. VIDT, MD-Series Editor | May 1, 2007
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Dr Vidt is past chairman of--and now a consultant to--the department of nephrology and hypertension at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. He is also professor of medicine at Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health in Columbus. Dr Vidt has been a member of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program and the writing group on 5 Joint National Committee reports on the prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure.

 

Q: What is "normal" blood pressure (BP)? Is it different from optimal BP?

A: This question is frequently raised by both clinicians and patients, particularly in view of the changing definitions of hypertension in the last several reports of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V, JNC VI, and JNC 7).1-3

For many years, a reading of 140/90 mm Hg served as the dividing line between normal and high BP and was used by many life insurance companies to determine the risk associated with hypertension. Observational studies have since demonstrated that the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) begins at BP levels as low as 115/75 mm Hg and doubles with each increment of 20/10 mm Hg. Prospective studies have repeatedly identified an increasing risk of CVD, stroke, and renal insufficiency at progressively higher levels of both systolic and diastolic BP. Furthermore, a positive, continuous, and independent association has been observed between BP and the incidence of CVD, stroke, heart failure, and end-stage renal disease.

As a result, the JNC V and JNC VI guidelines designated optimal BP as 120/80 mm Hg or lower, and normal BP as less than 130/80 mm Hg. They also included a high-normal BP category, which was defined as 130 to 139/85 to 90 mm Hg.

The newest classification. With the recognition of the consistent relationship between BP and the risk of CVD, independent of other risk factors, the authors of JNC 7 introduced a new classification of hypertension. The category of "prehypertension"—systolic BP of 120 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic BP of 80 to 89 mm Hg—was added to acknowledge the risk relationship across the entire BP range from 115/75 to 185/115 mm Hg. This new category signals the need for increased education of health care professionals and the public in order to reduce BP levels and prevent progression to sustained hypertension.

Normal BP is now considered to be below 120/80 and is synonymous with the previous designation of "optimal BP." Patients with sustained BP higher than 140/90 mm Hg are considered to have hypertension and are candidates for aggressive pharmacological therapy.

Management of prehypertension. Management is currently directed toward aggressive lifestyle modification, because at the time of publication of JNC 7, there were no prospective clinical trials that demonstrated reduced cardiovascular risk as a result of either lifestyle or drug treatment of prehypertension. Subsequently, a small prospective trial demonstrated that progression to sustained hypertension could be prevented during 2 years of pharmacologicaltreatment in patients with BPs of 130 to 139/85 to 89 mm Hg (which was considered high-normal BP at the time that the study was planned).4 Firm evidence from large prospective trials will be required before aggressive pharmacological therapy can be recommended for the more than 70 million persons who meet the current criteria for prehypertension.

Implications for your practice. I would be remiss if I did not remind clinicians that the diagnosis of hypertension should not be made on the basis of a single BP reading, unless that reading is extremely high or the patient has shown evidence of progressive target organ disease. Rather, a series of BP readings during a period of several weeks is appropriate; this should include out-of-office readings, which can now be obtained using a variety of automated and portable BP devices. The choice of antihypertensive agents and the aggressiveness of therapy will also relate, in part, to the presence of additional cardiovascular risk factors, such as hyperlipidemia, diabetes, cigarette smoking, sedentary lifestyle, and a family history of premature myocardial infarction or stroke.

Finally, JNC 7 has drawn its share of criticism relative to both its revised classification and its treatment recommendations. However, I encourage you to continue to use these recommendations pending future developments. Such developments may include classification and treatment recommendations based on global cardiovascular risk and guidelines that take into account all of the cardiovascular risk factors in a patient with new-onset hypertension.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.





REFERENCES:
1.The Fifth Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V). Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:154-183.
2.The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157:2413-2446.
3. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The JNC 7 Report. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206-1252.
4. Julius S, Nesbitt SD, Egan BM, et al. Feasibility of treating prehypertension with an angiotensin-receptor blocker. N Engl J Med. 2006;15:1685-1697.


 
TOPIC INDEX

Asthma

Atrial Fibrillation

Cardiovascular

Cerebrovascular

Developmental/Genetic

Diabetes

Diabetes Type 2

Fibromyalgia

Geriatrics

GI Disorders

Gout

Health Care Reform

HIV/AIDS

Hypertension

Infection

Mental Health

 

Musculoskeletal

Nervous System

Nutritional/Metabolic 

Otorhinolaryngologic 

Pain

Pediatrics

Physical Abuse

Respiratory Tract 

Rheumatic Diseases

Seasonal Allergies

Skin Diseases

Sleep Disorders

Urologic Diseases

Vaccines

Women’s Health

All Topics

 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Five Steps to Improving Patient Access
Judy Capko,  May 21, 2013
Patient access is getting increased attention through reform initiatives. Here are five steps you can take to make sure patients get appropriate access to care in your office.
Growing HIPAA Threat – Ignore Windows XP at Your Own Peril
Marion K. Jenkins,  May 21, 2013
Chances are good that you have some major ticking software time bombs lurking in your medical practice's computer environment, namely Windows XP and Server 2003.
Finding Physician Work-Life Balance in the Small Moments
Jennifer Frank, MD,  May 21, 2013
At my practice and at home, things are always busy. There's laundry or homework, or a patient with needs.
Three Areas to Reduce Costs at Your Medical Practice
Greg Mertz,  May 19, 2013
By taking a hard look at reducing costs for staffing, overhead, and technology at your medical practice, you may see increased physician compensation.
Dos and Don’ts for Starting a Physician Blog
Michael Woo-Ming, MD,  May 18, 2013
Starting a physician blog can provide your medical practice with marketing benefits, but it's important to do it right.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Why Doctors Commit Suicide
  • T-Wave Inversions: Sorting Through the Causes
  • Ecchymosis: A Photo Essay
  • Go For The Glory Quiz: Xanthomata, Foreign Body Aspiration, Drug Interactions, Fingernail Clubbing
  • New Diabetes Algorithm Geared to Primary Care
  • Why Doctors Commit Suicide
  • New Diabetes Algorithm Geared to Primary Care
  • Alternate-Day Statin Therapy
  • Some Do’s and Don’ts for Tough-to-Treat Hypertensives
  • Tuberculosis Diagnosis With Handheld Device
  • Physician, First Do No Harm—To Yourself
  • Top 10 Common Medication Errors—Drug #9: Clonidine
  • A Future of Beta Blockers “Plus” to Treat Hypertension?
  • CPAP Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Improves Levels of Inflammatory Biomarkers
  • A Requiem for Beta Blockers to Treat Hypertension?
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • Hypertension Disorders—A Photo Essay
  • Go For the Glory Quiz: Longstanding Head and Neck Pain; Burning Sensation in Lower Extremities; Friable Papule; Unexplained Facial Pimples
  • New Diabetes Algorithm Geared to Primary Care
  • Medical Training for the 1%
  • Hypertension Prevention Campaign Spearheaded by WHO
  • Making the Most of Antihypertensive Drug Combinations
  • A Requiem for Beta Blockers to Treat Hypertension?
  • Wanted: Physician Feedback on Medical Cannabis
  • Some Do’s and Don’ts for Tough-to-Treat Hypertensives
  • Oro-labial Herpes Simplex (“Cold Sores”)
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Hypertension
Evidence on Hypertension
Guidelines on Hypertension
Patient Education on Hypertension
Clinical Trials on Hypertension
Practical Articles on Hypertension
Research and Reviews on Hypertension
All "Hypertension" results



CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy