
OR WAIT null SECS
This episode covers the recently announced topline data from the TRIUMPH-2 and TRIUMPH-3 phase 3 trials, as well as a study investigating online GLP-1 sales.
Welcome back to Diabetes Dialogue: Technology, Therapeutics, & Real-World Perspectives!
Triple hormone receptor agonism is emerging as a frontier in metabolic disease treatment, and topline phase 3 results for retatrutide suggest the strategy can push weight loss and glycemic control beyond current incretin therapies, even as a separate JAMA analysis raises questions about oversight in online GLP-1 prescribing.1,2
On the latest episode of Diabetes Dialogue, hosts Diana Isaacs, PharmD, and Natalie Bellini, DNP, reviewed topline results from the TRIUMPH-2 and TRIUMPH-3 trials of retatrutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and glucagon receptor triple agonist.
TRIUMPH-2 enrolled 1000 participants with type 2 diabetes across 98 centers and tested 4 mg, 9 mg, and 12 mg doses against placebo over 80 weeks. The 12 mg dose produced weight loss up to 21% from a baseline of 106 kg, or roughly 23 kg. Hemoglobin A1C fell between 1.4 and 1.6 percentage points from a baseline of 7.7%, versus 0.2 points with placebo, a large glycemic effect given the near-normal starting A1C and discontinuation of 14% at the highest dose.
TRIUMPH-3 enrolled over 1900 participants with class II or III obesity (body mass index of 35 or higher) and established cardiovascular disease, randomized to 9 mg, 12 mg, or placebo over 80 weeks. The 12 mg dose delivered 23% weight loss versus 3% with placebo, alongside a 37% reduction in triglycerides, 17% reduction in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and 9.3 mmHg reduction in systolic blood pressure. Major adverse cardiovascular event outcomes trended favorably but did not reach significance, an expected limitation of an 80-week trial.
Gastrointestinal effects were common across both trials, including diarrhea in up to 34% of participants and nausea in up to 28%, consistent with the broader incretin class.
Isaacs and Bellini also discussed a JAMA secret-shopper study, led by Ashwin Chetty, MD, examining online GLP-1 prescribing across 49 telehealth websites. Of these, 92% prescribed the requested medication and 70% mailed it, often without required photo verification, blood work, or clinician video visits, in some cases within five minutes. Compounded formulations, including unproven sublingual drops, were frequently offered alongside add-on supplements marketed as personalization, a workaround linked to compounding rules requiring documented medical need.
Together, the findings illustrate a widening gap between the therapeutic ceiling GLP-1-based agents are reaching in controlled trials and the variable oversight surrounding real-world access to these drugs, underscoring the need for clinicians to proactively screen patients for unsupervised use.
Editors’ Note: Isaacs reports disclosures with Dexcom, Abbott, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic, Insulet, and others. Bellini reports disclosures with Abbott Diabetes Care, MannKind, Povention Bio, and others.