
OR WAIT null SECS
Pooled data from 3 trials show H-ISDN cuts all-cause and cardiovascular death in HFrEF, though heterogeneity limits clinical impact.
A prespecified meta-analysis of three placebo-controlled trials found hydralazine plus isosorbide dinitrate (H-ISDN) reduced all-cause and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Jawad Haider Butt, MD, PhD, presented the pooled findings, drawn from 2101 patients across V-HeFT I, A-HeFT, and the newly completed H-HeFT trial, at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress 2026 in Munich, Germany.¹
H-ISDN cut the risk of all-cause death by 29%, though the effect on heart failure hospitalization proved less consistent.³
Guidelines currently reserve H-ISDN for patients unable to tolerate an ACE inhibitor, ARB, or ARNI, and for patients who self-identify as Black with NYHA class III or IV symptoms on foundational therapy. This guidance traces to the 2004 A-HeFT trial, which showed a 43% mortality reduction with H-ISDN added to standard therapy at the time.² The H-HeFT trial set out to test whether similar benefit extended to a broader, contemporary population.
Guideline recommendations for H-ISDN stem from small, older trials individually underpowered for mortality. The meta-analysis sought to strengthen the evidence base by combining all available placebo-controlled data in HFrEF.
Butt and colleagues combined trial-level data from V-HeFT I (1986), A-HeFT (2004), and H-HeFT to answer a question neither trial alone was powered to resolve: does H-ISDN reduce mortality? In the primary fixed-effect analysis, H-ISDN was associated with reduced all-cause death (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.87) and cardiovascular death (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.90) compared with placebo.³ A reduction in heart failure hospitalizations also emerged, but significant between-trial heterogeneity prompted a sensitivity analysis using a random-effects model.
Under the random-effects model, mortality estimates held steady, but the hospitalization benefit lost statistical significance.³ Butt noted 2 of the 3 trials were underpowered for mortality alone, part of the rationale for pooling the data. The meta-analysis was prespecified before H-HeFT's primary results were unblinded.
H-HeFT, presented separately by principal investigator Lars Køber, MD, enrolled 592 patients with HFrEF who did not self-identify as Black, all receiving foundational therapy. Over up to 7 years of follow-up, H-ISDN failed to reduce the composite primary endpoint of death, worsening heart failure, urgent intravenous or metolazone therapy, transplantation, or ventricular assist device implantation compared with placebo.¹
Event rates were 8.6 vs 9.3 per 100 patient-years (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.67-1.21). All-cause death occurred in 19.4% of the H-ISDN group versus 24.2% of the placebo group (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.02), a gap not statistically significant on its own.¹
Treatment discontinuation rates were high in H-HeFT, a factor that may have diluted the drug's apparent effect.¹ Because the primary endpoint in H-HeFT was neutral, Butt considers the meta-analysis findings hypothesis-generating rather than practice-changing.
Køber said a new randomized trial will be needed to establish whether H-ISDN truly reduces mortality.¹ Butt agreed such a trial remains justified, given the residual risk for death and hospitalization left by current four-pillar HFrEF therapy, though he noted the absence of commercial sponsorship makes investigator-initiated trials difficult to mount.
Editors’ Note: Butt reports disclosures with AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Novartis.