
OR WAIT null SECS
Two-season real-world data show Arexvy reduces RSV-related MACE and COPD and asthma exacerbations in adults 60 and older, Ann Falsey, MD, says.
Real-world data spanning 2 respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) seasons show adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination (Arexvy) reduces the risk of RSV-related major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations, and severe asthma exacerbations in adults 60 years and older.1,2
Ann Falsey, MD, professor of medicine at the University of Rochester School of Medicine, whose research focuses on clinical and translational studies of respiratory viral infections in adults, discussed the findings with HCPLive during the 2026 European Respiratory Society (ERS) Congress.1
The 2-season analysis was presented as a late-breaking poster at the ERS Congress 2026 in Barcelona, Spain, extending 1-season findings GSK presented in February 2026 at RSVVW'26. The retrospective study used Optum Research Database claims data (August 2022-May 2025), comparing 662,982 vaccinated adults with 2,651,928 unvaccinated adults, matched and propensity-weighted for baseline balance.
"They all dropped a little from season one to cumulative over season two, but to my way of thinking, they're in the same ballpark. You have to look at the confidence intervals, not just the point prevalence. These severe outcomes of major cardiovascular events, COPD exacerbations, and asthma exacerbations are, in my mind, all in the same range," Falsey said.
The 2-season analysis found VE of 58.5% against RSV-related MACE (95% CI, 46.0-68.1%), 57.6% against severe COPD exacerbations (95% CI, 46.1-66.7%), and 57.3% against severe asthma exacerbations (95% CI, 22.3-76.6%). These figures converge more tightly across outcomes than the season 1 data GSK presented at RSVVW'26, when VE measured 63.1%, 74.4%, and 61.6% for the same three endpoints. Falsey said similar protection against COPD and asthma exacerbations fits with RSV's tendency to trigger airway hyperreactivity regardless of the underlying obstructive disease.
Falsey noted comparisons of vaccinated and unvaccinated populations carry inherent risk of healthy user bias, since people who seek vaccination often engage in other health-protective behavior. Investigators addressed this using propensity score matching to balance the 2 cohorts, though Falsey cautioned some unmeasured bias can persist even with careful matching.
The study was funded by GSK, with most coauthors employed by GSK or Optum. Falsey, an independent academic investigator, reviewed the data and interpretation. She said real-world evidence complements randomized trial data by capturing populations, such as immunocompromised and frail adults, generally excluded from clinical trials, along with infrequent endpoints such as hospitalization.
Falsey called revaccination timing purely conjectural but estimated a second dose might make sense around 3 to 4 years post-vaccination, depending on the threshold of protection against serious outcomes clinicians and patients find acceptable. The poster's authors noted the 2-season results may help inform future recommendations on revaccination timing.
Editor’s note: Falsey reports institutional research support from AstraZeneca, BioFire Diagnostics, Janssen, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, and Sanofi Pasteur, and personal/advisory fees from CyanVac, GSK, and Vax Co. This transcript has been edited for grammar and clarity using artificial intelligence tools.
References