Advertisement

What Dermatologists Can Do to Make AI More Equitable

Published on: 
,

Strategic Alliance Partnership | <b>Skin of Color Society</b>

Roxana Daneshjou, MD, PhD, outlines steps to close AI equity gaps in dermatology, from diverse data sets to camera testing for skin of color.

Roxana Daneshjou, MD, PhD, assistant professor of biomedical data science and dermatology at Stanford University, outlined concrete steps the medical and technology fields can take to close AI equity gaps for patients with skin of color.1,2

Her discussion of these steps continues a conversation with Morayo Adisa, MD, medical director of Dermatology Physicians SC in Chicago and Kenilworth, Illinois, which took place during the latest episode of Skin of Color Savvy: The Art and Science of Treating Patients of Color, a podcast hosted by Skin of Color Society (SOCS) leaders and produced by HCPLive.

What Can Be Done to Improve AI Equity in Dermatology?

Daneshjou said progress starts with diversifying who is involved in developing artificial intelligence technology, noting that representation is essential to recognizing when data sets or algorithms fail to reflect diverse populations. She credited organizations such as SOCS for prioritizing this work and said expanding diverse data sets remains a key priority. She also pointed to growing reliance on chatbots for medical information, stressing that researchers must identify and publicize flaws in how these tools respond to health questions relevant to patients with skin of color.

Daneshjou referenced her own prior research documenting racially biased chatbot responses to medical questions, noting that public attention after its publication contributed to later improvements from technology companies. She said she would prefer equity testing built into development rather than addressed only after products reach market.

Are Some Cameras or AI Systems Better for Skin of Color?

Asked whether any camera systems or algorithms currently outperform others for imaging skin of color, Daneshjou said she was unaware of empirical data supporting specific claims and was unwilling to endorse any product without direct testing. She noted that both Apple and Google have taken steps toward improving how their technology captures diverse skin tones, based on conversations with research teams at each company.

Daneshjou also referenced her past criticism of an early Google dermatology algorithm with limited representation of Fitzpatrick skin types V and VI, saying she remains willing to challenge large tech companies when warranted, while acknowledging both are investing in improvement.

Editor’s note: This episode was summarized with the help of AI tools.

References

  1. Kaundinya T, Kundu RV. Diversity of Skin Images in Medical Texts: Recommendations for Student Advocacy in Medical Education. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021 Jun 11;8:23821205211025855. doi: 10.1177/23821205211025855. PMID: 34179498; PMCID: PMC8202324.
  2. Adisa M, Daneshjou R. Skin of Color Savvy: Tech Check—AI, Telederm, and the Bias Question. HCPLive. July 13, 2026. Accessed August 10, 2026. https://www.hcplive.com/view/skin-color-savvy-tech-check-ai-telederm-bias-question.

Advertisement
Advertisement